• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

  • Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
  • Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
  • Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

More...

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

More...

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

More...

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

More...

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

More...

Predictive Evaluation

Building a learning strategy for Australia's multigenerational workforce

Australia's workplaces now blend employees who started before fax machines with colleagues who have never known a workplace without Slack. From Sydney to Pilbara mine sites, the labour force spans four generations, with workers over 55 among the fastest-growing cohorts according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Generational differences shape every assumption about training. A survey of Melbourne employers found 60% of organisations struggle to design programs that resonate across age groups, amplified by skills shortages in resources, health, and advanced manufacturing.

Traditional models assume a uniform learner profile and treat cohorts identically, which often means none of them are fully engaged. As demographics shift, learning leaders must rethink format, duration, and delivery channels.

A modern approach combines skills forecasting, modular design, and adaptive delivery. Many organisations turn to Dave Basarab Consulting when they need to rethink their learning function.

Mapping the generational landscape

Australia illustrates the generational spectrum clearly. Resources operations in the Hunter Valley still rely on experienced tradespeople nearing retirement, while Adelaide's defence industry recruits graduates fresh from university. Mid-career professionals in Perth and Canberra hold the institutional memory that keeps operations stable.

Baby Boomers tend to value structured classroom sessions and detailed reference materials, often as mentors transferring tacit knowledge. Generation X employees prefer blended programs combining self-paced modules with occasional face-to-face sessions.

Millennials and Gen Z workers, now the largest cohorts in many intakes, expect mobile-first learning, micro-credentials, and frequent feedback. Recognising these preferences is not about stereotyping; it is about matching how different people prefer to learn.

Tailoring learning formats

A common mistake is treating blended learning as a single model. Genuine flexibility offers multiple entry points into the same content. A senior operator at Port Hedland may benefit from a printed job aid, while a junior analyst in Parramatta might prefer an interactive scenario on their phone.

The goal is to anchor programs to clear business outcomes, then offer delivery channels that serve varied audiences. Designers should audit content for accessibility, cultural relevance, and cognitive load on busy learners.

Format choices that consistently work locally:

  • Short scenario-based modules through mobile for deskless workers
  • Quarterly in-person workshops for complex skill transfer
  • Self-paced digital courses with optional live drop-in sessions
  • On-the-job coaching reinforced with reflection journals
  • Microlearning bursts triggered by performance moments

Developing leaders across the age divide

Leadership capability becomes critical when a workforce spans four generations. Supervisors in Brisbane retail may report to managers who report to executives with decades of experience, all while managing team members half their age. Each layer needs targeted development in coaching, feedback, and inclusive decision-making.

Challenges are acute in remote and hybrid contexts where informal learning moments that happened in corridors now need engineering into virtual workflows. Research on leadership for remote managers shows collaboration norms deteriorate when supervisors lack skills to read non-verbal cues across video calls.

Investing in leadership pipelines that address age diversity creates a multiplier effect on every other learning investment. When managers understand how to motivate a 58-year-old expert and a 24-year-old analyst through the same project, engagement climbs.

Predicting training impact before rollout

Boards from Perth to Sydney now demand evidence that learning investments reduce safety incidents, lift sales, or accelerate product launches. Predictive evaluation offers a way to forecast outcomes before committing budget, using proxy indicators and historical adoption data.

The methodology examines leading indicators such as enrolment rates and engagement signals rather than waiting until program end. A mining organisation rolling out a safety protocol can predict adoption within two weeks and adjust before expensive problems emerge.

Combined with rigorous instructional design, teams build a clearer business case that resonates with executive sponsors. Organisations adopting predictive evaluation report stronger alignment with strategic priorities.

Aligning learning with business priorities

Linking learning to strategy requires more than matching course titles with corporate objectives. It means tracing the chain from a capability gap, through a defined intervention, to a measurable outcome. Australian companies often find their learning portfolios have drifted into disconnected programs that satisfy auditors but move few strategic metrics.

Addressing this drift begins with an audit of existing initiatives, followed by rationalisation around a smaller set of priorities. Remaining programs are designed with input from operational leaders, building ownership and improving completion rates.

Many organisations seek external perspective when internal teams lack large-scale transformation experience. Engaging specialists for enterprise learning strategy work helps clarify priorities and avoid funding every available program.

Comparing approaches across generations

Comparing delivery preferences across generations highlights where most assumptions break down. Different cohorts respond to different triggers, feedback styles, and mentorship opportunities, and recognising those patterns helps learning leaders design more inclusive programs.

Aspect Baby Boomers Generation X Millennials Generation Z
Preferred delivery In-person workshops Blended digital and live Mobile-first social Short interactive bursts
Learning trigger Career credentials Problem-solving needs Career progression Immediate application
Feedback style Quarterly formal reviews Project-end debriefs Continuous real-time Instant peer-based
Mentorship role Mentor to others Bridge between cohorts Often mentors Gen Z Peer and reverse mentors

Habits of mature learning cultures:

  • Career pathing tied to specific skill development
  • Recognition valuing both tenure and contribution
  • Flexible scheduling for caregiving and study
  • Choice of delivery channel for mandatory programs
  • Cross-generational project teams building mutual understanding

The most successful learning strategies in Australian workplaces treat generational diversity as a strategic asset rather than a logistical inconvenience. When organisations invest in formats that respect different preferences, develop leaders who guide mixed-age teams, and measure adoption before claiming success, they create environments where every employee contributes at full potential. The capability built today will determine how well Australian businesses compete in regional markets and global supply chains tomorrow, and the workers who feel genuinely developed are the ones who will stay to build that future.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.

More...