Your Chief Virtual Learning Architect

Learning to Performance

Read More
Custom Design & Delivery

Read More
Predictive Evaluation

Read More
Enterprise Learning Strategy

Read More

› ‹

1
2
3
4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

Predictive Evaluation

How to Handle Stakeholder Skepticism About Training ROI

Training is often approved because leaders believe employees need new knowledge or skills. Yet support can weaken when executives ask how the program will affect revenue, productivity, customer retention, risk, or operational efficiency. Their concern is valid: training activity alone does not prove business value.

Stakeholder skepticism about training ROI becomes easier to manage when learning teams connect capability-building to measurable business outcomes. The goal is not to promise perfect attribution. It is to establish a credible chain between the problem, the intervention, employee behavior, and organizational results.

A strong case also recognizes that different stakeholders define value differently. A finance leader may focus on cost reduction, while an operations executive may care about cycle time and a department head may prioritize quality or retention. The business case should reflect those priorities from the beginning.

Start With The Business Problem

The most persuasive training proposal begins with a performance gap rather than a course description. Instead of saying employees need a leadership workshop, describe the observed issue: slow decisions, inconsistent coaching, avoidable rework, weak customer conversations, or low adoption of a new process.

Ask what the gap costs the organization and what evidence supports it. Existing performance reports, quality data, customer feedback, sales metrics, and manager observations can establish a baseline. If training is not the right intervention, this process will reveal that early and protect the learning function from funding programs that cannot solve the root cause.

Translate Learning Into Measurable Outcomes

Learning objectives should describe what participants will do differently, while business measures show why that change matters. A customer service program might target accurate issue diagnosis, with first-contact resolution and escalation rates serving as related performance indicators. A sales program might connect consultative questioning to conversion rate or average deal value.

For a practical framework, learning leaders can review how to align learning objectives with key performance indicators. This alignment helps stakeholders see that evaluation is designed into the initiative rather than added after delivery. It also gives facilitators and managers clear signals to reinforce after the training event.

Show The Value Chain Clearly

Stakeholders are more likely to trust a proposal when its logic is visible. A value chain can show how the intervention is expected to influence performance:

Evaluation Point	Useful Evidence	Stakeholder Question
Business need	Baseline performance and cost data	What problem are we solving?
Learning	Knowledge, skill, or confidence measures	Can participants perform the target task?
Adoption	Manager observations, system use, workflow behavior	Are employees applying it?
Performance	Quality, speed, sales, safety, or service data	Has behavior affected results?
Financial value	Benefits, avoided costs, and program expenses	Was the investment worthwhile?

This structure prevents a common mistake: treating attendance, satisfaction, or assessment scores as proof of financial return. Those indicators have value, but they represent progress toward impact rather than impact itself. The evaluation plan should specify which measures are leading indicators and which are lagging outcomes.

It is also important to state what the program cannot claim. Business results are influenced by technology, market conditions, incentives, staffing, management practices, and process design. A credible learning business case explains these factors and uses comparison groups, trend analysis, manager validation, or participant data where appropriate.

Use Forecasting Before Spending

ROI conversations often happen after a program has launched, when changing direction is expensive. A forecasting approach allows the learning team to estimate likely adoption, impact, and return before committing substantial resources. This is especially useful for enterprise initiatives with multiple audiences, locations, or delivery methods.

The Predictive Evaluation model offers a way to assess expected value before implementation. Forecasting encourages stakeholders to examine assumptions, identify risks, and agree on success thresholds. It shifts the discussion from “Can you prove training caused everything?” to “What evidence would justify continuing, adapting, or stopping this investment?”

Build A Shared Evaluation Agreement

Skepticism often reflects a lack of agreement about what success means. Before delivery, bring sponsors, finance partners, operational leaders, managers, and learning professionals together to define the target behavior, measurement period, data owners, and decision rules. A short evaluation charter can capture these commitments.

The agreement should also clarify responsibilities after the course. Managers may need to observe application, provide coaching, remove workflow barriers, or report adoption data. Without reinforcement, even well-designed learning can produce limited business impact, and stakeholders may incorrectly blame the training rather than the surrounding conditions.

Make The Business Case More Credible

Use these practices to make discussions about training effectiveness more evidence-based:

Establish a baseline before participants begin learning.
Separate activity measures from adoption, performance, and financial measures.
Ask operational leaders to validate the expected business effect.
Forecast value using conservative, moderate, and optimistic assumptions.
Report partial gains, limitations, and unexpected findings openly.

A clear scorecard can then give stakeholders regular visibility without overwhelming them. Monthly updates might show participation and early behavior changes, while quarterly reviews examine operational and financial outcomes. Reporting should emphasize decisions: scale the program, revise the learning experience, improve manager support, or stop funding an intervention that is not producing value.

Training ROI does not have to be presented as a single precise number. In some cases, the strongest evidence is reduced risk, faster adoption of a strategic system, improved readiness, or a measurable shift in operational behavior. The standard should be disciplined reasoning supported by relevant data, not false certainty.

When learning teams connect capability to performance in this way, skepticism becomes useful. Difficult questions expose weak assumptions and encourage better instructional design, stronger reinforcement, and more focused measurement. Organizations can then invest in learning with a clearer view of how employee development supports business results.

Dave Basarab Consulting helps organizations design learning strategies, custom programs, leadership development, learning bursts, and evaluation approaches that connect training with measurable outcomes. Contact the team to develop a credible business case and evaluation plan for your next learning initiative.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.