Your Chief Virtual Learning Architect

Learning to Performance

Read More
Custom Design & Delivery

Read More
Predictive Evaluation

Read More
Enterprise Learning Strategy

Read More

› ‹

1
2
3
4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

Predictive Evaluation

The real cost of inadequate employee training

Many Australian employers still treat learning as a line item to minimise rather than a long-term investment that pays back. When organisations cut corners on staff capability, the consequences rarely show up in the training budget itself. Instead, they emerge slowly across rework, churn, safety incidents, and missed targets. The true price of skipping or underfunding development is almost always higher than the savings posted on paper.

This is especially true in industries with strong award structures, regulated training packages, and remote workforces where skills gaps can shut down a site overnight. Whether your team operates from a Sydney office, a Pilbara mine, or a Brisbane call centre, the maths of neglecting employee capability tends to compound quickly.

Productivity drain you cannot see in a spreadsheet

When staff are not properly trained, every process takes longer than it should. New hires fumble through tasks their more competent counterparts could finish in half the time. Errors require rework, supervisors spend hours rescuing stalled projects, and customer-facing teams escalate issues that clear protocols could have resolved on the first contact. Over a quarter, those small deltas add up to thousands of lost productive hours.

Australian data on skills shortages shows employers regularly cite lack of capability as a barrier to growth. In sectors like construction and aged care, an untrained or partially trained worker can hold back an entire shift. The cost is not just the wages paid; it is the output that never gets logged, the contracts delayed, and the opportunities handed to competitors who can deliver faster.

Compliance exposure and workplace safety risk

Inadequate training creates legal exposure that goes well beyond conventional HR headaches. Under Australian employment and WHS laws, employers must provide instruction, supervision, and training that allow workers to perform safely. When an incident occurs, investigators will look closely at induction records and competency verification before assigning blame.

A single notifiable incident can trigger regulator attention, internal reviews, and possible prosecution. Insurance premiums may rise at renewal. More importantly, the human cost of a preventable injury cannot be written off as an operational line item. Effective training acts as both a moral obligation and a financial safeguard.

Turnover, recruitment, and cultural damage

Workers notice when an employer invests in them, and they notice even faster when it does not. Underinvested training programs send a signal that staff are interchangeable rather than valued. That signal drives quiet quitting, then resignation. Replacing a mid-level employee in Australia typically costs between 50 and 150 per cent of annual salary when you factor in recruitment fees, onboarding lost output, and reduced team morale.

There is also a cultural price. Teams that repeatedly "just make do" stop raising quality concerns and develop workarounds that paper over capability gaps. Over time, this erodes the very standards that customers, clients, and regulators expect. Rebuilding that trust once lost is far more expensive than supporting the team from the start.

Side by side, the major hidden cost areas stack up as follows.

Hidden Cost Area	Typical Trigger	Short-Term Signal	Long-Term Consequence
Lost productivity	Slow onboarding and rework	Missed deadlines and overtime creep	Lost contracts and weaker market position
Compliance breaches	Outdated inductions	Audit findings and minor incidents	Regulator action, fines, premium hikes
Safety incidents	Skipped procedures	Near-miss reports and minor injuries	Serious injury, prosecution, brand damage
Staff turnover	Perceived lack of investment	Rising exit interviews and low engagement	Recruitment cost, knowledge drain

Measuring what actually changes

Most organisations cannot improve what they do not measure, yet training outcomes remain stubbornly vague in many board reports. A useful starting point is mapping adoption signals across the workforce: completion rates, application confidence, observed behaviour change, and downstream business results.

Tools like Intention Dashboards help leaders forecast whether a learning initiative will actually transfer into daily work or whether it will fade within weeks. Pairing those forecasts with hard metrics like error rates, time-to-proficiency, and customer satisfaction closes the loop between activity and value.

Designing training that fits Australian workplaces

Local realities shape what good training looks like. FIFO rosters, split shifts, and regional travel mean that traditional classroom blocks often fail. Blended delivery, microlearning bursts, and on-shift reinforcement suit dispersed teams better than generic e-learning catalogues. Even the way Australians speak in the workplace, from the casual "no worries" of the office to clipped instructions on a remote site, affects how messages land.

There are proven frameworks for handling these constraints. Practical shift-based training delivery can be tailored to rosters that never sit still. When learning fits the rhythm of the workplace, completion rates climb and the question of cost begins to answer itself.

Warning signs that training investment is too thin:

Induction takes less than a full shift before workers handle live tasks
Supervisors spend more time correcting than coaching
The same procedural errors reappear each month
Compliance documentation is outdated or unverified
Experienced staff routinely redo tasks meant for junior roles
Learning is treated as a once-a-year event rather than an ongoing rhythm

Practical ways to measure the hidden cost:

Compare error and rework rates before and after a training rollout
Track average time-to-competency for new starters by role
Calculate replacement cost as a percentage of annual salary for each departure
Survey confidence levels at 30, 60, and 90 days post-training
Link learning data to lagging indicators like safety outcomes or customer satisfaction
Run a small pilot and compare forecast adoption against observed behaviour change

The figure that matters is not the line marked "L&D budget". It is the total drag placed on payroll, productivity, compliance, and retention when capability gaps are left open. Australian employers who treat training as strategic infrastructure, rather than a compliance chore, consistently outperform peers who treat it as a cost to be trimmed. When you tot up the rework, the churn, the incidents, and the missed revenue, the cheapest training program almost never stays the cheapest one.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.