• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

  • Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
  • Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
  • Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

More...

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

More...

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

More...

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

More...

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

More...

Predictive Evaluation

Measuring The ROI Of Microlearning In Australian Workplaces

Short-form training has become a practical response to crowded calendars, dispersed teams and constant technology change. A five-minute lesson can reinforce a safety process, clarify a sales behaviour or help a new manager prepare for a difficult conversation without removing them from productive work for half a day.

However, completion rates and positive learner reactions do not prove commercial value. A credible evaluation approach must connect participation with behaviour change, operational performance and financial outcomes. That connection is especially important when learning budgets are being scrutinised across Australian organisations.

The ROI of Microlearning: Measuring Short-Form Training Effectiveness requires a clear definition of value before content is produced. When the intended business result, target behaviour and evidence sources are established early, learning teams can distinguish useful performance support from content that merely fills an app or learning management system.

Measurement area Useful evidence Possible business result
Reach and participation Starts, completions, repeat views More employees access required learning
Knowledge and confidence Quiz results, scenario decisions, self-ratings Improved readiness for a task
Workplace behaviour Observation, system records, manager checks Greater consistency and fewer errors
Operational impact Quality, speed, sales, safety or retention data Reduced cost or increased productivity
Financial return Benefits compared with programme costs Defensible training investment

Why Short Learning Needs Business Measures

Microlearning is valuable because it fits moments when employees need information. A warehouse worker may check a short safety demonstration before a shift, while a consultant in Melbourne may review a client-conversation prompt between meetings. These use cases make access and relevance important, but they do not automatically create measurable impact.

Evaluation should therefore move beyond “how many people watched it?” Useful questions include whether employees applied the skill, whether managers observed a change and whether a relevant business indicator moved. A short module about cybersecurity, for example, should be assessed through reporting behaviour, phishing-test results or reduced incidents rather than completion alone.

Where Microlearning Creates Value

The strongest business case usually comes from repeated, specific actions. Short lessons can support onboarding, compliance refreshers, product updates, leadership habits and workflow changes. They are particularly effective when spaced over time and reinforced at the point of need.

Australian organisations also operate across large distances and varied work patterns. A team spread across Sydney, Perth and regional Queensland may not share the same local schedules, connectivity or access to a desk. Mobile-friendly learning can reduce time away from work, though it must remain accessible, concise and relevant to each role.

Designing For Mobile-First Workforces

Effective learning bursts begin with a performance problem rather than a preferred format. Each burst should address one observable outcome, use realistic examples and provide a simple opportunity to practise or apply the behaviour. Content can then be distributed through an LMS, collaboration platform or approved mobile channel. Dave Basarab’s guidance on mobile-first learning bursts offers a useful basis for designing this experience.

Australian everyday habits can shape delivery decisions. Employees may consume content during public transport commutes in Sydney, between customer visits or during scheduled toolbox meetings. Designers should account for intermittent connectivity, small screens, captioning and device policies rather than assuming every learner has uninterrupted broadband or a quiet office.

Forecasting Adoption Before Launch

A programme can be well designed and still produce little value if employees do not intend to use it. Before launch, learning teams should test perceived relevance, confidence, manager support, access conditions and the likelihood of applying the skill. These indicators help forecast adoption and identify barriers while changes are still affordable.

A structured intention evaluation method can help connect learner responses with predicted behaviour and business outcomes. This is more useful than waiting months for lagging results, particularly when the training addresses a new system, sales process or leadership expectation.

Turning Evidence Into Financial Return

ROI calculations should include development, platform, facilitation and employee time costs. Benefits may include fewer defects, lower rework, shorter time to competence, reduced incidents, improved customer retention or increased sales conversion. Where precise financial attribution is difficult, organisations can use a combination of trend data, comparison groups, manager evidence and conservative estimates.

Custom content is often needed when a generic lesson cannot reflect the organisation’s workflow, terminology or risk environment. A custom training approach can make the learning more applicable and improve the quality of evidence collected afterwards. Australian compliance contexts also matter: training connected to work health and safety duties should support, rather than replace, the employer’s broader consultation, supervision and risk-control responsibilities. Privacy obligations under the Privacy Act 1988 should also guide the handling of learner and performance data.

Measurement Practices That Support Better Decisions

A practical measurement model should be proportionate to the programme. Not every five-minute lesson needs a complex study, but every significant initiative should have a defined purpose, baseline and decision rule. The following practices help learning teams create a reliable evidence trail:

  • Define the business problem and target behaviour before scripting content.
  • Select one or two leading indicators, such as confidence, practice or manager observation.
  • Pair learning data with operational measures such as quality, safety, speed or sales.
  • Segment results by role, location, tenure and access pattern to identify unequal adoption.
  • Estimate total costs, including employee time and technology administration.
  • Review results at agreed intervals and improve, retire or expand the learning burst.

Measurement should also reflect the legal and cultural setting in which people work. A mandatory module may show high completion because of policy requirements, while voluntary leadership content may need stronger manager reinforcement. Comparing these programmes on completion alone can produce misleading conclusions.

The most useful ROI story is a chain of evidence: employees accessed relevant content, demonstrated greater capability, applied the behaviour and contributed to a measurable business improvement. For Australian learning leaders, the practical takeaway is to define that chain before launch and collect the smallest set of trustworthy measures needed to make a confident investment decision.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.

More...