Your Chief Virtual Learning Architect

Learning to Performance

Read More
Custom Design & Delivery

Read More
Predictive Evaluation

Read More
Enterprise Learning Strategy

Read More

› ‹

1
2
3
4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

Predictive Evaluation

Why training ROI must capture innovation and morale

When learning leaders in Brisbane and Melbourne justify training budgets, conversations usually centre on productivity, error reduction and revenue lift. These are defensible, yet they miss wider effects on teams. Genuine learning programs also reshape how people think, collaborate and what they attempt. Uncounted outcomes make strategic value look smaller, and funding skews toward short-term wins.

Australia illustrates the tension well. Sectors from resources in Western Australia to professional services in Sydney face shortages, so organisations can no longer hire their way to growth. Upskilling existing employees, particularly mid-career cohorts, has become a strategic lever. Measuring only easily quantifiable outputs risks undervaluing the very capability building that addresses long-running workforce needs.

The blind spot in conventional training ROI calculations

Most learning evaluation defaults to a familiar hierarchy of reaction, learning, behaviour and results. The final tier is where ROI conversations live: sales uplift, defect rates, time-to-proficiency. These metrics are essential but narrow. Innovation, creativity, retention of high performers and psychological safety rarely appear in the spreadsheet, even though learning is often their primary catalyst.

This creates perverse incentives. Program designers optimise for what gets measured, leaving out higher-order skills that take months to mature. Leaders reviewing quarterly summaries see modest gains and question renewal. Without a methodology for capturing intangible benefits, the spreadsheet never tells the truth.

Innovation as a strategic payoff

When teams experience design thinking, emerging technology or problem-solving frameworks, dividends are rarely immediate. They show up in proposals that improve processes, ideas pitched upward and redesigned workflows. A Perth mining team completing a digital fluency program may not save hours next quarter, but six months later may redesign a reporting process entirely.

The challenge is connecting those dots without overstating causation. Innovation metrics such as ideas submitted, experiments run and pilots offer proxies. Combined with employee feedback, they build a more complete case. Where programs iterate based on participant input, a focused refining custom training modules approach helps translate voice-of-learner data into measurable improvement.

Morale, engagement and the bottom line

Morale is dismissed as soft, yet it tracks with retention, absenteeism and discretionary effort. In Australia's tight labour market, replacing an experienced hire in Adelaide or Canberra can cost upwards of a year's salary once recruitment, onboarding and lost productivity are tallied. Training that invests visibly in people's growth tends to lift the signal employees read as "this employer cares about my development".

This shows up in engagement surveys, in how people describe their workplace, and in how quickly high performers leave when they feel stagnant. Programs that build leadership, peer coaching or resilience produce morale benefits that compound over years. Treating morale as a luxury line item rather than a workforce stability lever is a costly mistake.

Australia's workforce realities that matter

Several local factors sharpen the case for broader ROI thinking. The mining sector in Western Australia and Queensland faces persistent skills gaps that make employee development a strategic priority. Healthcare providers in Victoria and New South Wales are tackling burnout and retention pressures that targeted learning can ease. Sydney's finance and professional services sector competes fiercely for talent, making employer brand pivotal.

For smaller businesses outside capital hubs, accelerated onboarding design and modular learning bursts can shorten time-to-competence without lengthy leave cover. Generational expectations are shifting; younger Australian workers weigh development opportunities as heavily as salary, a critical retention factor many leaders overlook.

Putting intangible value on the scorecard

Putting intangible benefits on the scorecard means defining what to measure before the program starts. Capability confidence, idea generation rate, collaboration scores and qualitative shifts in team language become data points when tracked deliberately. Pairing pre- and post-program pulse surveys with behavioural observation produces evidence that withstands executive scrutiny.

It also means accepting some uncertainty. Predictive Evaluation, for example, models adoption and impact using leading indicators rather than waiting for lagging financial results. The shift lets learning teams advocate for investment based on probability-weighted projections, a richer conversation than asking executives to wait twelve months for proof.

Comparing evaluation approaches

Three commonly referenced approaches handle tangible and intangible benefits differently.

Approach	Tangible Outcomes	Intangible Outcomes	Time Horizon
Kirkpatrick-Phillips ROI	Strong	Weak	Short to medium term
Balanced Scorecard	Moderate	Moderate	Medium term
Predictive Evaluation	Strong	Strong	Short and long term

Reading the comparison side by side shows why so many programs struggle to make the case for continued investment. Frameworks that lean heavily on lagging financial outcomes miss innovation and morale entirely. Approaches that surface leading indicators give a richer picture and tend to inform better decisions on resource allocation.

Building a balanced business case for learning

A balanced business case combines financial projections with capability, culture and innovation evidence. Start by mapping the program to strategic priorities, then articulate what each stakeholder needs to be convinced. A chief financial officer wants probability-weighted returns; a chief executive wants workforce capability; a people leader wants engagement signals.

Frame the narrative around movement, not just outcomes. Innovation and morale do not arrive as line items; they accumulate as patterns across teams, products and customer experiences. Documenting those patterns is what separates a learning function that earns sustained investment from one that fights for renewal every budget cycle.

Recommendations for learning leaders building balanced business cases

Define three to five intangible outcomes at design and decide how each will be measured.
Use pulse surveys at thirty, sixty and ninety days to capture morale shifts.
Track innovation proxies such as ideas submitted, pilots launched and projects initiated.
Align intangible metrics with business priorities, including retention in regional operations.
Build a longitudinal view by revisiting cohorts six and twelve months after completion.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative stories from interviews and feedback.

Start by treating innovation and morale as data points in the next program plan, pairing them with productivity evidence and shifting the executive conversation from defending training to investing in capability. When that happens, learning becomes a measurable contributor to long-term business performance rather than a recurring budget debate.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.