Your Chief Virtual Learning Architect

Learning to Performance

Read More
Custom Design & Delivery

Read More
Predictive Evaluation

Read More
Enterprise Learning Strategy

Read More

› ‹

1
2
3
4

Dave Basarab Consulting has elevated the training experience, offering an end-to-end comprehensive approach that includes training strategy, instructional design, development, delivery , post program training transfer, and evaluation (via the unique Predictive Evaluation methodology). Virtual Chief Architect Dave Basarab has combined all of these individual training elements with his user-friendly, comprehensive Learning to Performance approach, which significantly increases companies' training ROI.

Why we are different

Innovation: Our primary focus is creating learning programs using a Learning to Performance approach.
Expertise: Dave offers the depth and breadth of his experience, including working internally at prestigious companies (Motorola, Ingersoll Rand and Pitney Bowes) as well as his knowledge and expertise as a highly-respected, sought-after consultant.
Partnership: Basarab collaborates with companies, serving as their own Chief Learning Officer whenever they need to plan, strategize, or implement training initiatives.

Training Services

Enterprise Learning Strategy

Enterprise Learning Strategy

At Dave Basarab Consulting, we're experts in creating Enterprise Learning Plans. We work with you to develop your company's learning strategy and direction.

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom Design, Development, & Delivery

Custom training is an effective way of developing the capability required to execute your strategy. We are a custom design house that creates programs specific to your business.

Learning Burst Development

Learning Burst Development

We can create and deliver your courses via our unique Learning Burst Method - keeping your employees at their jobs while receiving world-class training.

Predictive Evaluation

Predictive Evaluation

We predict the ROI for your courses and establish success gates. We then evaluate the course against the success gates to show value realized and continually improve results.

Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Turn-key virtual custom leadership development program that combines world-class leadership speakers/educators with post-event personalized coaching to provide you with a cadre of highly skilled leaders.

Predictive Evaluation

How executive sponsorship shapes training adoption success

Training programs in Australian organisations often look strong on paper yet stall once employees return to their desks. The missing ingredient is rarely the content; it is the weight of a senior leader standing behind the program. Without an executive sponsor who visibly champions the work, even well-designed learning initiatives struggle to move the needle on performance, retention, or revenue.

In a market where skills shortages stretch across mining, healthcare, and professional services, and where regulators like ASQA keep a close eye on credentialed training, every dollar spent on capability-building must count. Executive sponsorship turns learning from a side activity into a business priority, and that shift is what separates programs that change behaviour from those that simply check a box.

Why executive sponsorship changes the game

When a C-suite leader attaches their name and reputation to a training initiative, the organisation receives a clear signal about what matters. Employees read the cues around them: which projects get airtime in executive meetings, which metrics appear on the board slide, which behaviours get rewarded in performance reviews. A sponsor who mentions the program in town halls, references it in strategy offsites, and holds teams accountable for applying new skills creates a gravitational pull that no L&D team can manufacture on its own.

The contrast is stark. Programs without a credible sponsor tend to live in the LMS, completed during quiet periods, and forgotten by the next quarterly cycle. With one, the same content becomes part of how the business talks about its future.

How effective sponsors actually behave

A title on an org chart is not the same as active sponsorship. The leaders who move adoption numbers tend to do five things consistently. They participate in launch events rather than delegating them. They carve out budget for reinforcement, not just delivery. They tell stories about how the learning changed a decision they personally made. They remove the bureaucratic blockers that quietly strangle rollouts. And they keep the topic alive in leadership forums long after the launch hype fades.

These behaviours are observable, and they are also measurable. Tools like Predictive Evaluation help L&D teams track whether the sponsor's involvement is translating into the adoption signals that matter most: completion, application, and business impact.

Australian workplace realities that shape sponsorship

The Australian business environment brings its own flavour to this conversation. In Western Australia's resources sector, supervisors in the Pilbara often manage fly-in fly-out crews where training competes with rosters, fatigue, and safety briefings. A sponsor who understands those pressures can frame learning as a tool for safer, more autonomous shifts rather than another compliance burden.

In Sydney's professional services market, where talent churn has pushed annual turnover above twenty per cent in some firms, sponsors have learned that capability-building is a retention lever, not just a development expense. Melbourne's manufacturing and health precincts, meanwhile, deal with multi-union workforces where the language of "lift" and "fair go" resonates far more than imported corporate jargon. A sponsor who can translate the business case into terms that respect mateship, safety, and the long weekend tends to land the message.

Measuring the difference sponsorship makes

The gap between sponsored and unsponsored programs shows up clearly when you compare adoption signals side by side. Sponsorship does not magically improve content quality, but it lifts the rate at which employees engage, apply, and sustain new behaviours.

Dimension	Program without executive sponsor	Program with active executive sponsor
Completion rates	Often below 50%	Typically above 80%
Application on the job	Sporadic, hard to evidence	Documented through manager check-ins
Sustained behaviour change	Fades within a quarter	Embedded in performance reviews
Budget for reinforcement	Minimal or one-off	Protected line item
Stakeholder willingness to act on data	Low	High

When L&D teams frame these comparisons in business terms, the conversation with the executive team shifts from "we ran training" to "we built capability that the business is using".

Where sponsorship efforts fall down

The most common failure mode is the sponsor who agrees in principle and then disappears. Their name appears on the launch slide, their photo sits in the comms pack, and nothing further happens. A second pattern is the sponsor who delegates completely to HR or L&D, stripping the program of its executive voice. A third is the sponsor who backs the program publicly while quietly funding competing priorities, which sends a mixed message that employees pick up within weeks.

Each of these patterns can be diagnosed early if L&D teams are watching for them. Pulse surveys, manager feedback, and adoption dashboards all surface warning signs before a program is declared a failure.

Practical moves for L&D leaders in Australia

For learning leaders looking to strengthen executive sponsorship in their own organisations, a few moves tend to deliver outsized returns:

Map each major learning program to a named executive and a specific business outcome they own.
Brief the sponsor with a one-page "what good looks like" sheet before launch, not after.
Build visible reinforcement rituals: monthly sponsor-led check-ins, story-sharing in leadership forums, and references in CEO updates.
Use micro-learning formats like learning bursts within your LMS to keep the topic front of mind between formal sessions.
Connect the program to a broader enterprise learning strategy so sponsorship sits inside a coherent narrative rather than a one-off campaign.
Track adoption metrics monthly and present them in the language the leadership team already uses.
Retire programs that lack genuine sponsorship rather than letting them quietly drain engagement.

The strongest predictor of training adoption is not the quality of the slide deck or the slickness of the platform. It is whether a senior leader is willing to stake their credibility on the outcome. Australian organisations that treat executive sponsorship as a core deliverable, rather than a courtesy, consistently see learning translate into measurable business performance.

Learning to Performance

Learning to Performance, a complete training approach, gives companies world-class training to drive significant return. This approach includes upfront work (Impact Mapping, design), training (for staff and company executives), and post-training efforts to ensure training transfer. This unique recipe - the key for successful training and adoption - is changing the way companies implement training. This methodology could work with any content for organizations in any industry.